|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 18:49:57 GMT -5
New fender design pictures, purchased trailer fenders of the appropriate size for $22 a piece. Purchasing all the brake line components in the next few days, lots of -3 AN lines. Also going to put the hydraulic clutch off the race motor I purchased onto this engine so I can use the master cylinder I have.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 18:53:40 GMT -5
What size heim joint are you using to connect the front lower control arm to the upright? The lower control arm rod ends are made by FK and are 1/2" in size. All the others are the same. The push rods and steering tie rods are 3/8" in size I wouldn't trust a 1/2" rod end in that position. Good question you pose. I would answer that by saying that they were not originally designed to be used in a situation where shear forces are the primary stress. If you're going to use them so, use quality parts and err on the side of caution in terms of sizing. I would be going with a 3/4" rod end.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 18:54:53 GMT -5
This has street/track use in mind, off road trucks tend to use 3/4-1" rod ends on their suspension. The only place where larger might be needed is the lower fronts because of the push road point putting the a-arm in shear. In the future, once I have finalized a suspension setup that makes me happy I plan to put spherical bearings on all ends of the a-arms. Either that or standard car joints, can't think of what they are called, but those have their own design quirks including being in single shear when mounted (which means the upright has to be designed to handle that joint). Your rod ends are fine in every position with the exception of the one that connects your lower A arm to your upright. That rod end (heim joint) is bearing the entire weight of the vehicle at that corner, not to mention road impacts etc. Those loads are all shear loads,which you're asking a 1/2" threaded shaft to bear. An auto motive ball joint is mounted differently so its main load is not a shear load, rather a tensile one. This is basically what I just said. In the future I will have a stronger joint, probably at all ends of the a-arms.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:01:26 GMT -5
Happy New Year 2014! From December '13
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:02:22 GMT -5
I understand what your saying Joker, but I would tend to think the opposite, that the force to remove the ball in the perpendicular direction is far less then the axial strength down the threads. Also from experience, you will bend the threads before you lose the ball. Basically in terms of failure on a rod end, shear at the threads is number one, then ball failure, then axial failure down the threads. www.fkrodends.com/PMXTPMXLT27.htmlI'm thinking the half inch version here will suit me fine for testing before I move to non alterable joint type.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:04:06 GMT -5
So he basically said exactly what I am saying at the end of the article, build adjustable setups for testing and then build a final set with spherical joints once the proper suspension setup has been decided on. I agree with what you are saying, but if you read what I wrote I am calling out specific load types, I am not talking about the manufacturer numbers or whether they are saying axial or radial or whatever. The rod end in bending is the number one failure mode, this is caused by shear force at the threads, whether from the brakes or the weight of the vehicle coming through the push rods. Side note here, when I had a chance to drive a three wheeler down in Florida the company allowed me to drive their test vehicle which had rod ends at the lower upright joint, before I got into the car I made them change both sides because it was bent and they were running a ~900lb car with driver, they also beat this car up all the time so that probably didn't help. So even though we are all light, we are not light enough. To all those out there building and reading this forum take note of this conversation between Joker and myself, its important to the safety of your vehicles.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:05:27 GMT -5
Terrific discussion. Well reasoned, with sources supplied and informative. Sorry I have nothing to contribute, but I thought I might take advantage of the knowledge base here. I have only one set of rod ends in the front, those being on the inboard end of the steering links, normally the joints at the ends of the steering box. I installed them with the rod end ball positioned vertically instead of the usual horizontal mount, to avoid any possible angle limitations. This results in the ball's primary movement spinning in the race rather than wobbling side to side. I must admit to not seeing them used this way on the forum and wonder why. More friction perhaps? Is this ok?
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:06:48 GMT -5
Need some pictures on this one, I think I know what your talking about but I am not sure, and I can't find your thread where you have pictures of the steering system.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:07:54 GMT -5
Hi All, The 6,700 lbs rated rod end is commonly known as an economy rod end, it is not a good choice for a lower ball joint. It will bend under normal operation and break in a crash. How do I know this? Twenty years of racing formula cars and using rod ends as lower ball joints. For the lower ball joint I use a 1/2”chrom moly rod end rated at 16,500lbs, at all other attachment points I use the 6,700 lb rated rod end. Excellent source for rod ends and information is www.rodendsupply.com/ They have been around for a long time and they are racers that use their products. I put about 10,000 miles on my first trike with no problems using the same configuration of rod ends. Trike weighed 1,050 lbs empty and seated two people. My current trike has over 15K on it with no problems with this set up, seats four and weights in at 1,230 empty. I have autocrossed both trikes and tend to abuse them when out joy riding and have not had any problems with rod ends bending or failing. Jim
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:09:34 GMT -5
Actually, as I look at some of the chassis pictures of your trike I do see rod ends used, as I tried to describe, on the ends of the links that take motion from the lower A-arms to the rockers and coilovers. Why are they turned 90 degrees on the outboard ends of the A-arms? Probably no functional difference as long as off road type suspension travel is not needed, and ball angle limit in the race is not exceeded. Just curious. If, as Joker says, pushing the ball out of the race is a possibility, using the mounting method you have on the coilover links would seem to address that. But as you say, the threaded ends would probably be the failure point anyway, so no help there. The thread on my steering system was deleted for reasons unknown. Inquires to staff have not been answered. Do you know anything about it Jim?
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:11:49 GMT -5
If I am reading you correctly the rod ends are put that way so that their normal direction of rotation is in plane with the rotation of what they are attached to such as the rockers. On the uprights they are done that way to allow for maximum steering angle. Future designs on uprights may allow for the rod end/spherical joint to be rotated so the bolt axis is parallel to the direction of travel but structurally I don't think it makes much difference. I agree with Jim and his conclusions from experience, I just purchased 4 rod ends from FK with 23k static load rating for my test setup, a bit pricey at $44 a piece though. This does not negate the need to put correct joints where required but from a "do I feel safe" stand point think I will do just fine with my current design until the new setup is built and ready.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:12:47 GMT -5
44 bucks a piece. Yes I can see why Jim would only use them at the lower link. Nonetheless, Its a small amount to pay to avoid a reconfig for a ball joint. I would be tempted to go with the high strength rod end but maybe in a bit larger size; 5/8 or 3/4. Anyway, if you want to take a bit more effort to do it the safest way possible, can't argue with that. Yes, you did understand my question, and I understand your explanation. Thanks,TT.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:13:50 GMT -5
Mid January '14 Sunday I completed my first internal and external thread on my lathe, they were mock up test pieces for what I am going to make with the spindles. I used 14 threads per inch after testing 16 and 13 to see what seemed right. Its a nice feeling to have the two threads lock together for the first time and know you did it right. I will have a pic up for this next weekend. I also got around to installing the hydraulic clutch and started plumbing the clutch and the rear brake, both should be completed next weekend. I am looking into using even stronger lower rod ends on the front suspension which come in about 20% stronger then the ones I just bought and use a 1/2" bore with 5/8"-18 threads making the shank a lot stiffer. Still trying for a mid February first drive, well see if it happens with all the work travel I have been doing lately (currently in New Mexico).
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:15:32 GMT -5
Jan 14' Lots of things are happening quickly, I just accepted a new job and I am moving to Mooresville, NC so I will be leaving behind my newly finished shop and taking my trike with me. I have two and a half weeks to smash through all the little things I need to finish to get the trike out of the road. Anyway, the spindles are almost done, I have one last nut to make which is proving to be more difficult then I thought for some reason. I have bought thread cutting tools (vardex makes nice tools) and learned how to cut threads on my lathe and have been learning quite a lot at a rate slower then I am putting out bad parts. I do not like the way that the machinist hand book lays out thread dimensions, I understand why they did it the way they did but it should just be an OD or ID and a depth to cut with a tolerance. Mostly its just badly written in my opinion and so I am ranting about it because I cut some threads to deep. Regardless life will go on. I installed the hydraulic clutch from the race motor, but its missing a piece that attaches the speed sensor so I need to make that. The fenders are on order again after waiting two months for trailerpartsdepot.com to ship nothing apparently, canceled that order. Also another complaint...trailer fender dimensioning is really stupid (22-1/2" L x 7" W x 8-1/4" H), backing out the diameter of tire that will fit from this information is a pain without a CAD sketch. The fact that most places list the size of the rim the fender should fit makes no sense, and the weird thing is they all do it. After finishing the machining on my steering rack mounts I found out that waterjet cutting circles is not exactly a good way to do things. The mount holes for the rack are canted sideways by the draft of the jet and so we get what you see in the picture which needs to be fixed by the 1-1/2" end mill I bought yesterday. Basically the draft causes the circle to be cut at an angle because of the way the jet moves through the radius. Worse case I have the tools to make ones entirely on the mill now, just not the time. I also bought a new M4 systems slip on exhaust tip which has the bonus of sounding different and not requiring a secondary mount point off the bike tail like the stock muffler, well see how it works out when it shows up next week. I still need to bust ass and get the new A-arms, steering tie rods, and push rods made so that the suspension will actually work correctly and safely.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:18:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:20:04 GMT -5
Hi, Sorry this info may be a little too late to help you with cutting threads. Anyway, it makes life a little easier if you cut the O.D. a few thousands undersize. For example when cutting a 1/2" thread, I would cut O.D. to .496". Set the lathe compound at 61 deg., set tool just slightly under centerline, easiest way to set insert tool holder is to move carriage until insert tool holder touches face of chuck, that will cause insert point to be 90 deg to centerline. Turn compound handle inward slightly, this removes any backlash. Set compound dial to 0.000". Turn lathe on and turn cross slide handle to move tool towards work piece, continue until insert just touches work piece. Set cross slide dial to 0.000" Now comes the math part, Divide 1 by the number of threads you wish to cut. Multiply that by .75, the answer is how deep you turn the COMPOUND DIAL in ward. Using our example of a 1/2" thread, here is the math. 1/2"-20tpi 1/20=.050" .050x.75=.0375 (round to 0.038") 3/4"-16tpi 1/16=.0625 .0625x.75=.046875 (round to .047") Taking multiple passes cut the thread by turning the compound in until you reach the number the formula provided. This formula works with any diameter. I have a little "cheat sheet" chart printed out of the tpi and the depth to turn compound in for pitches from 4 to 40 that saves me doing the math every time I cut a thread. Yours, Jim
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:21:09 GMT -5
Early Feb '14 Jim, thanks for the response, I did get the threading done using the machinist handbook. Only a few spare chunks of metal from the process. Currently I have no actual plans for a body or a canopy, with my move I will be severely limited in what I can fabricate. Anyway, as of today, the front suspension is all together minus the sway bar, the brakes front and rear are installed and working although they need a better bleed done. I built new steering attachments for the uprights that have correct ackermann angles so that the tires turn the way they are supposed to. Saturday night we did a late night test in the driveway, still no shifter or clutch or throttle currently but it can do a u-turn on maybe a 15 foot radius, I am going to measure it against my dad's truck today when I have time and see how tight I can actually turn. Also did full light check, all the bracketing isn't made but all the blinkers, headlights, and brake lights work, now its on to finishing all the small stuff, I am trying to have the vehicle to the brake and lights inspection tomorrow, but that is going to be a big push today even if they are only a block away.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:23:35 GMT -5
Finally coming down the home stretch, tomorrow should be the first drive, tonight I did a idle test to see how the engine temps were just sitting in the garage. I was going to do the first drive today but it got dark and its been raining straight for the last three days. I had my last day at my old job on Friday, time for bigger and better things on the east coast. Sadly the Spartan will not get the chance to terrorize the streets of its birth place...yet. My lights and lamp inspection is on Tuesday, then its off to the highway patrol on Wednesday to VIN the chassis and get their certification and then to the DMV for registration. Then after all that I stick it in the penske truck on Friday night and drive to the Charlotte, NC. So long house/shop. Anyway to the important stuff. I finished mounting the radiator with the fan and wired it in, also put a tee in with a high pressure cap for a high point fill on the coolant system. The shifter was fabricated and installed, it works but its squishy because the linkage is not rigid enough so that will be one of the first things to be beefed up. The brakes were done with 37 degree flares as was the clutch, both were bled and worked first time out of the box. The throttle got finished today but it still needs to be tuned a little, the throw isn't long enough so its very touchy. I also got around to building the battery box at the front and running all the wiring that way with the throttle line, which is a bike brake cable if anyone is wondering, its 1/16" thick which is just slightly larger then the stock bike. Also something I don't have a picture of is the engine end of the throttle, its a small brass piece I turned and threaded with a set screw on the side locking the wire in place (ill grab this on the next update). Theoretically it every system runs currently, so they should all work as a whole tomorrow, I will figure out how to post a video if it does.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:25:05 GMT -5
Feb 10th '14 First drive happened today, still alive and kicking although the neighbors are a bit confused. It drives really well, and it accelerates really fast even with stock gearing. I will post video when I get the chance. Lights and brake inspection in the morning, still lots of little things to fix and finish though. need to build the airbox, fenders, and belt mounts are at the top of the list. Video Links on Youtube - First drive
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:29:19 GMT -5
Mine looked very similar to that when I started. After a little rehab: Old ford blue was a bit much for some, went to wrinkle black (Duplicolor) later. I'm more bothered by your lack of a front engine mt. Great that you can get it out and drive it though. Add my congrats to the others already received. (Edit 3 hrs later)More recent photo. Please note air horn. Weak motorcycle horns cannot be heard in traffic and may get you killed when trucks decide to change into you lane on top of you. This nearly happened to me. This horn cost under 50 bucks, and has its own built in compressor. It will be heard and can save your life.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:30:36 GMT -5
Feb 19, 2014 Currently in Nashville on my way to Charlotte, North Carolina. One more day. Thank you for all the kind responses, the overall response to my trike has been very positive except one neighbor who was less then impressed by my noisy runs up and down the street at 8pm. I took the trike to Reno, NV last Friday, the day before I left and installed power commander V and showed it off to some locals, a few of them ventured test drives. The idea had been to put in on the dyno but the shop didn't understand that it was a motorcycle engine and their setup could not handle it so that got shot down. If you are ever in Reno, say hello to the boys at Infinite Velocity Motorsports, their isn't much they can't work on from small block sand rails to Austin Martins. I also took this thing to my high school last week and talked to the metal shop class about my design and drove it around the parking lot for them. From their reaction I think they thought I was an alien from another planet, I have never gotten anywhere near the amount of interest in mechanical engineering then I did then. All of them that wanted to sat in it and some of them asked me about what classes they should be taking to do what I do. I donated almost all the metal in my garage that I was not taking with me to the school as well, which turned out to be a lot, I wish I had a picture of it. In regard to the stator cover, I will grind it smooth and repaint it first thing after I get the engine mounts made. I know I need the upper mounts but hadn't come up with a design I liked until late last week and by then everything was in the truck. So soon after I get a new welder that runs on 120v AC. I left almost my entire shop in California for this opportunity so my fab work will be much slower. To Mr. Kelly, thanks for the kind words, honestly I love designing and fabricating and just creating automotive stuff, its kind of like art work to me because it can go in so many directions. I always try to share my passion with others and hopefully inspire them to do what makes them happy whether that be automotive related or not so I am glad that I have helped you in that direction. I will be looking forward to seeing your designs and creations on here in the future.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:31:57 GMT -5
Its a Wolo Bad boy. They have an extensive product line. Available at Amazon or any big motorcycle parts retailer. I think I bought their cheapest one. It has a plastic housing but a cast alu. mounting point. It's worked without problem for the 2 years I have had it. Certainly worth the money. Just a little bulky for bikes, great for trikes. Looks like you are having blast Captain. You earned it. Now that you are mostly done, hope will continue to keep us posted on the refinements to come and adventures generated.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:32:40 GMT -5
Great job, especially at your age. It's hard to stay focused on a project for this long. Building a vehicle from scratch is a daunting task. Many try and only a few succeed. Hopefully someone is taking care of your machinery and you can be reunited with it soon. My daughter lives in NC in Fayetteville. Her husband in in the Army, we were just there this summer. Very pretty and green. Humid and hot in the summer. Hope you enjoy your new job and do stay in touch. I'd like to see it painted and completely done.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:33:32 GMT -5
Love the headlights. Looks like what I have been looking for. LEDs? Street Legal? Effective? Brand name and retailer? Thanks in advance. Captains rather busy. Anybody else got a clue what those are or where I can get something similar? If they have a provision for dimming they are legal in Ok.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:34:22 GMT -5
The lights are street legal driving lights, no dimming, I am going to try and come up with a circuit that dims them by lowering input power. $80 for the pair I believe, im not totally sold on them yet but the housings are metal which is really nice, they have a good feel to them. Summit Racing Part Number: SSE-950-30000 UPC: 600700300006 Light Style: Driving Lens Color: Clear Shape: Round Watts: 55.0 watts Diameter (in): 2.500 in. Depth (in): 3.700 in. Housing Color: Black
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:35:23 GMT -5
Made it to Charlotte, signed the lease on the new apartment and unloaded the truck. Here is one more video from back home, I am going to update this post soon with some pictures from out here. Nothing got damaged in the move that I know of, time to put the suspension back on and get going again. Side note/question: What does everyone else get on miles per gallon? I haven't been shifting out of first gear because the linkage is not strong enough, soon to be fixed, but I seem to be getting about 2mpg, I have had to fill the tank twice now. Put together by a friend of mine who came by to help me move with his GoPro camera.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:38:26 GMT -5
In the forums Gsxr 1000 riders report anywhere from 35 to 55 MPG. Being double the weight with a lot more rolling resistance than the bike, I should think you can expect to fall in the lower end of the range or beneath it. I have gotten anywhere from 43 to 60 MPG. To be honest, the 60 MPG was not real world. I drove through half a tank at a constant 59 mph on the highway. Road trips yield 52 to 55 with 45-50 when just knockin' around. Those figures came after I dropped a tooth on the counter sprocket (About 7 percent shorter)for smoother launches. It cost me about 5 percent on fuel economy. I could not help but notice in your video that you were using a lot of revs and clutch slipping to get off a dead stop. This is to be expected. Sport bikes are so light they can get by with a really tall first gear. Double the weight and that gearing no longer works so well. Being an old sport bike rider, I can tell you just adding the weight of an average size passenger on a bike means you are in for some clutch slipping. You may consider dropping a cog yourself. Too bad we cannot juggle the individual ratios instead. It would be great to have a taller 6th for more relaxed cruising and fuel mileage with a shorter first and second for launches(wider ratio spacing).
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:39:43 GMT -5
One tooth on the front sprocket is like 3 teeth on the rear. So like said dropping 1 tooth on the front will help with the launch but your crusing RPM will go up. I also like to replace the clutch springs with heaver ones to keep the clutch from slipping with heavy loads and speeds. Easy to change springs, need a gasket for the side cover. Your gas mileage will be very low using only 1st gear. Your net effect gear ratio is like 21:1 (including the internal reduction gears). Heavy duty clutch springs are a great idea. Motorcycle clutches are to light while working through a foot pedal anyway. Should help that situation as well. My son's Ninja 500 would cruse along and he would crank on the throttle and as the bike accelerated, the RPMs would soar. He finely listened to Papa and found out that if he backed off the throttle the RPMs would drop back down some. I had explained that he was having clutch slipping issues. He took the clutch basket out, cleaned up the basket added new disc's. Then we tried two different heaver springs sets. The heavest caused his hand to hurt and the next lightest was not much better that the stock ones so we put in 3 heavy and 2 lighter ones. I think they were like $9 a set so easy to change and figure out the best combo. The springs were spec'ed for a Ninja 1000 I think and came with 6 but his clutch basket takes 5. In the lower gears the slippage still happens but you can not tell as much. Its when you are in top gear and hammer it.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:45:59 GMT -5
Ned Kelly, (I am assuming) Nice work finding one for that price, hopefully its still turns over and is fully function from and engine drive train perspective. I am going to release my chassis drawing sometime in the next two weeks if that interests you or anyone else on here. It will be my current chassis with all the fixes along the way but it should still be relatively easy to build. Sheet metal is thicker then it should be, the reality is it should be 16 gauge, there is everything from 18 to 10 on the chassis. Andrew
|
|
|
Post by CaptainAmerica on Dec 21, 2018 19:47:42 GMT -5
Ned, Currently I think the weight with me in the vehicle is sitting around the 1100lb range with me in it, I guess conservatively so that I won't be depressed when I put it on the scales. It could be done quite a bit lighter the second time around. I am guessing this based on the distance the springs compress and their spring rate. The idea was 300lbs per front wheel and 400 on the rear wheel. I am near this value, but I think the rear is heavier. The front springs are 100lb/in and the rear is 450lb/in (stock off the bike). Below is the actual dimensions of the chassis, which I will call the A chassis. I also have a modified A chassis that keeps basic dimensions it better for manufacture and safety. There is also a B chassis that I have been working on for quite awhile now that redesigns the whole front end, that will be the second chassis I make if I have the time. Please let me know if there are any dimensions that I missed, this is a general, non detailed version obviously, I will update this post with the top view tomorrow probably.
|
|